It may be a well-known reality that all versions of Visual Basic from 1.0 to 6.0 were to be retired by Microsoft, by 2008. This implies that the Visual Basic development environment and related runtime environments (except for Visual Basic 6) are not supported. In a way, VB6 is dead since it is not being created by Microsoft. Microsoft discharged the .NET Framework in 2001, together with a new language C# and an upgraded Visual Basic .NET version.
With this release, it obtained new capabilities by means of the .NET system libraries. Most of the .NET framework libraries were composed in C# making it far more accessible to developers than VB.
Is Visual Basic really that bad?
VB had a legacy base when it started out and anybody writing code at that time had more than likely used VB. VB.NET was so immensely different from legacy VB that it had a risky upgrade path. VB and VB.NET syntax look visually indistinguishable indeed in spite of the fact that they are two completely distinctive languages.
During that period, C# was favored by Microsoft, since it was the one language most systems are composed in and it is more concise than VB.NET. VB.NET and C# have similar libraries, meaning anything that can be done in one language is also possible, within the other. C# has a few exclusive usefulness like multi-line lambdas, and VB.NET has optional and named parameters which are specific to each. These contracts are likely to reduce with each new release of the .NET framework and moving forward developers will be able to work on either platform seamlessly.
One fundamental drawback with VB.NET is that it needs a few core functionality which is easily made available in C#. As a result, numerous programming languages prefer to use the C# method more than the VB.NET strategy. Once you consider VB, it intentionally covers up a few standards which cause just as much confusion to developers as enthusiasm. There’s a general myth among programmers that VB.NET may be a more comfortable language in spite of the fact that it does not make the development process any better than other programming languages.
With Microsoft arranging to go big on cloud and mobile, more
VB and VB .net developers
will continue to switch to C#. Basically, this move is due to Xamarin which has a C# shared codebase for iOS and Android and are not supported in VB. Apart from this, there was an idea that C# was the essential language of the .NET system. Most of the libraries were composed in C# because it shared wealthier documentation and test C# code. All these factors made a feeling among VB developers that if they were getting to switch to the .NET platform, they might as well change to C#.
In spite of all this, VB proceeds to exist because it is the large-scale language of Microsoft Office. Moreover, the move from VB to C# code is much more helpful with a .NET Framework. These days, VB is generally utilized for Windows Forms applications and a number of ASP.NET Web Shapes. Numerous of the modern VB developers have been switching to C# after finding its rich ecosystem. C# will keep evolving as a state-of-the-art programming language that will be utilized by programmers universally, within the days to come.